Pakistan has again decided to raise the Kashmir issue at the United Nation. Bharat maintains that Kashmir is a bilateral issue which should be resolved between the two countries. During direct talks with Pakistan Bharat (aka India) equivocates and then claims that Kashmir is an internal matter. Thus there has been no progress on the issue for the past sixty years. Nehru’s Commitement to Kashmiris & un-implemented UN resolutions on Indian Occupied Kashmir
“That Government of India and Pakistan should make a joint request to U.N.O. to undertake a plebiscite in Kashmir at the earliest possible date.”JAWAHARLAL NEHRU (In telegram No. Primin-304 dated 8 November 1947 addressed to Prime Minister of Pakistan).
“We have always right from the beginning accepted the idea of the Kashmir people deciding their fate by referendum or plebiscite………..”
ISLAMABAD: Pakistan has decided to take up the issue of Kashmir and Afghanistan effectively at a session of the United Nations General Assembly this year.
Pakistan will inform the international community about reservations with regard to Indian’s tactics not to resolve the Kashmir issue as well as the war against terrorism in Afghanistan.
The decision to this effect was taken during two separate meetings held at the foreign office, a private TV channel reported. Relevant authorities briefed the Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi about Kashmir and Afghanistan.
During the meeting it was decided that Pakistan would ask the United Nations to ensure a resolution of the long-lingering issue of Kashmir on a priority basis for durable peace in the region.
The international community would also be informed about the human rights violations committed by Indian forces in held Kashmir, sources said.
Besides officers of relevant authorities, officers of intelligence agencies including Director General Inter Services Intelligence (ISI) Lt. Gen. Ahmed Shujja Pasha attended the meeting.
Pakistan will also take up the issue of Afghanistan during the session and would inform the largest world body about problems being faced by Pakistan due to action of Afghanistan based allied forces in neighboring country, channel reported.
Issues related to smuggling of weapons and drugs from Afghanistan to Pakistan would also be discussed in at the largest forum of world. -Online. Pakistan to take up Kashmir, Afghanistan issue before UN Friday, 11 Sep, 2009 | 09:22 PM PST |
“Ultimately, the final decision of settlement, which must come, has first of all to be made basically by the people of Kashmir…….”JAWAHARLAL NEHRU Statement at Press Conference in London, 16 January 1951, The Statesman, 18 January 1951).
“But so far as the Government of India are concerned, every assurance and international commitment in regard to Kashmir stands.”JAWAHARLAL NEHRU (Statement in the Indian Council of States; 18 May 1954).
The current move is strategic as well as tactical. It is a brilliant move. It places pressure on Bharat to initiate the composite dialogue and it places Bharat in the list of countries that has flouted UN Resolutions. This dampens the Brazil India Germany and Japan move to seek an exalted status at the United Nations.
ISLAMABAD (APP) – The Deputy High Commissioner of India in Islamabad was called to the Foreign Office on Friday and Indian protest on Gilgit-Baltistan self-rule order was rejected.
The Foreign Office Director General (South Asia) emphasised that Pakistan rejects the Indian protest as the Government of India has no locus standi in the matter.
A Press release issued by the Foreign Office stated that the Government of Pakistan also rejects the Indian claim that Jammu and Kashmir is an integral part of India. “Pakistan’s position on Jammu and Kashmir dispute is based on relevant UN resolutions.”
Two protest notes were handed over to the High Commission for Pakistan in New Delhi on Friday by the Ministry of External Affairs of India, on the Gilgit-Baltistan (Empowerment and Self-Governance Order, 2009); and construction of Bunji Dam in Astore District.
Kashmir, Junagarh & Manvadar are Pakistani territory Kashmir: Does the article of accession exist? Peace is a two way street
Nehru’s commitment to the people of Kashmir
Pakistani territories occupied by Bharat (aka India) Northern Areas are part of Pakistan and were never part of Kashmir
For Kashmiris in Indian Occupied Kashmir “Azadi” means “freedom” from India and “independence” means becoming part of Pakistan
Any life lost is a loss to all humanity. The Indian Government numbers are around 60,000. International analysts say the number is twice that number. The Hurriyat which is in dialogue with the Indian Government and is a legitimate Kashmiri organization claims that the numbers are around 150,000 dead. We used 100,000 as the best estimate possible.
Occupied Jammu and Kashmiris want to sell their produce in Azad Kashmir. Northern Areas are not part of Kashmir and Azad Kashmir
- Indian Occupied Kashmir: Pakistan raises abuses at UN and OIC
- Nehru’s Commitement to people of Kashmir and various un-implemented UN resolutions on Kashmir
There has been a lot of activity on discussing Kashmir. However there has been little progress.Peace is a two way street. Historians have looked at the promises of previous Indian leaders on the subject. Nehru’s commitment to the people of Kashmir. Most Pakistanis know that Kashmir and Junagarh is Pakistani territory. There is a huge controversy on the Article of Accession. Recently the grand daughter of Shaikh Abdullah described the AOA as “provisional. Many Pakistanis and world historians have gone further and do not accept the notion that any such document exists. Kashmir: Does the article of accession exist? India’s UN seat is held hostage to the unresolved UN resolutions. UN resolutions, and Nehru speeches on disputed nature of Kashmir.
“If, after a proper plebiscite, the people of Kashmir said, ‘We do not want to be with India’, we are committed to accept that. We will accept it though it might pain us. We will not send any army against them. We will accept that, however hurt we might feel about it, we will change the Constitution, if necessary.”JAWAHARLAL NEHRU (Statement in the Indian Parliament, 26 June 1952).
“I want to stress that it is only the people of Kashmir who can decide the future of Kashmir. It is not that we have merely said that to the United Nations and to the people of Kashmir; it is our conviction and one that is borne out by the policy that we have pursued, not only in Kashmir but every where.
Here is some additional information NOT available to intelligent people of “Indian origin”. The resolutions have not been implemented and the plebiscite promised by Nehru was never held. …yeah yeah we have already heard the “Indian story which says that all forces need to be removed…but the UN resolution does not talk about “all forces”, simply REGULAR FORCES…..
Here are the facts:
http://www.na.gov.pk/s_kashmir_india_comitment.html
INDIA’S COMMITMENT OF PLEBISCITE FOR THE PEOPLE OF KASHMIR
“Our view which we have repeatedly made public is that the question of accession in any disputed territory or State must be decided in accordance with wishes of people and we adhere to this view.”JAWAHARLAL NEHRU, (in telegram No. 402-Primin-2227 dated 27 October 1947 to Prime Minister of Pakistan repeating telegram addressed to Prime Minister of United Kingdom).
“In regard to accession also, it has been made clear that this is subject to reference to people of State and their decision.”JAWAHARLAL NEHRU, (in telegram No.413 dated 28 October 1947 addressed to Prime Minister of Pakistan).
“ …….the people of Kashmir would decide the question of accession. It is open to them to accede to either Dominion then.” JAWAHARLAL NEHRU, (in telegram No.255 dated 31 October 1947 addressed to Prime Minister of Pakistan).
“Kashmir should decide question of accession by plebiscite or referendum under international auspices such as those of the United Nations.” JAWAHARLAL NEHRU, (Letter No. 368-Primin dated 21 November 1947 to Prime Minister of Pakistan).
“We are anxious not to finalize anything in a moment of crisis and without the fullest opportunity to be given to the people of Kashmir to have their say. It is for them ultimately to decide.
“And let me make it clear that it has been our policy all along that where there is a dispute about the accession of a state to either Dominion, the accession must be made by the people of that state.” JAWAHARLAL NEHRU, (Broadcast to the Nation: “All India Radio”: 2 November 1947).
“The issue in Kashmir is whether violence and naked force should decide the future or the will of the people.”JAWAHARLAL NEHRU, (Statement in Indian Constituent Assembly; 25 November 1947).
“We have not opposed at any time an over-all plebiscite for the State as a whole…….”JAWAHARLAL NEHRU, (in telegram dated 16 August 1950 addressed to the U.N. Representative for India and Pakistan: S/1791 : Anne 1(B).
“The most feasible method of ascertaining the wishes of the people was by fair and impartial plebiscite.”JAWAHARLAL NEHRU, (Joint press communique of the Prime Ministers of India and Pakistan issued in Delhi after their meeting on 20 August 1953).
“People seem to forget that Kashmir is not a commodity for sale or to be bartered. It has an individual existence and its people must be the final arbiters of their future.”JAWAHARLAL NEHRU, (Report to the All-India Congress Committee, 6 July 1951; The Statesman, New Delhi, 9 July 1951).
“Kashmir is not a thing to be bandied about between India and Pakistan but it has a soul of its own and an individuality of its own. Nothing can be done without the goodwill and consent of the people of Kashmir.”JAWAHARLAL NEHRU, (Statement in the Indian Parliament, 31 March 1955).
“We had given our pledge to the people of Kashmir, and subsequently to the United Nations; we stood by it and we stand by it today. Let the people of Kashmir decide.”JAWAHARLAL NEHRU, (Statement in the Indian Parliament, 12 February 1951).
“We have taken the issue to the United Nations and given our word of honour for a peaceful solution. As a great nation, we cannot go back on it. We have left the question for final solution to the people of Kashmir and we are determined to abide by their decision.”JAWAHARLAL NEHRU (Amrita Bazar Patrika, Calcutta, 2 January 1952).
“If, after a proper plebiscite, the people of Kashmir said, ‘We do not want to be with India’, we are committed to accept that. We will accept it though it might pain us. We will not send any army against them. We will accept that, however hurt we might feel about it, we will change the Constitution, if necessary.”JAWAHARLAL NEHRU (Statement in the Indian Parliament, 26 June 1952).
“I want to stress that it is only the people of Kashmir who can decide the future of Kashmir. It is not that we have merely said that to the United Nations and to the people of Kashmir; it is our conviction and one that is borne out by the policy that we have pursued, not only in Kashmir but every where.
“I started with the presumption that it is for the people of Kashmir to decide their own future. We will not compel them. In that sense, the people of Kashmir are sovereign.”JAWAHARLAL NEHRU (Statement in Indian Parliament, 7 August 1952)
“The whole dispute about Kashmir is still before the United Nations. We cannot just decide things concerning Kashmir. We cannot pass a bill or issue an order concerning Kashmir or do whatever we want.JAWAHARLAL NEHRU (The Statesman, 1 May 1953)
“Leave the decision regarding the future of this State to the people of the State is not merely a promise to your Government but also to the people of Kashmir and to the world.”JAWAHARLAL NEHRU (In telegram No. 25 dated 31 October 1947 addressed to Prime Minister of Pakistan).
“In regard to accession also it has been made clear that this is subject to reference to people of State and their decision.”JAWAHARLAL NEHRU (In telegram No.413 dated 28 October 1947 addressed to Prime Minister of Pakistan).
“That Government of India and Pakistan should make a joint request to U.N.O. to undertake a plebiscite in Kashmir at the earliest possible date.”JAWAHARLAL NEHRU (In telegram No. Primin-304 dated 8 November 1947 addressed to Prime Minister of Pakistan).
“We have always right from the beginning accepted the idea of the Kashmir people deciding their fate by referendum or plebiscite………..”
“Ultimately, the final decision of settlement, which must come, has first of all to be made basically by the people of Kashmir…….”JAWAHARLAL NEHRU Statement at Press Conference in London, 16 January 1951, The Statesman, 18 January 1951).
“But so far as the Government of India are concerned, every assurance and international commitment in regard to Kashmir stands.”JAWAHARLAL NEHRU (Statement in the Indian Council of States; 18 May 1954).
http://www.na.gov.pk/s_kashmir_india_comitment.html
Noticias de Rupia | Nouvelles de Roupie | Rupiennachrichten | новости рупии | 卢比新闻 | Roepienieuws | Rupi Nyheter | ルピーニュース | Notizie di Rupia | PAKISTAN LEDGER | پاکستاني کھاتا | Moin Ansari | معین آنصآرّی | DefensebriefsIntellibriefs Translate to: RSS feed: | RUPEE NEWS | November 30th, 2007 | Moin Ansari | معین آنصآرّی | اخبار روپیہ | Moin Ansari | December 10th, 2008 | معین آنصآرّی | اخبار روپیہ |
Kashmir in the United Nations
- Resolution 38 (1948) adopted by the Security Council at its 229th Meeting held on 17 January 1948
- Resolution 39 (1948) adopted by the Security Council at its 230th Meeting held on 20 January 1948
- Draft Resolution presented by the President of the Security Council and the Rapporteur on 6 February 1948
- Resolution 47 (1948) adopted by the Security Council at its 286th Meeting held on 21 April 1948
- Resolution 51 (1948) adopted by the Security Council at its 312th Meeting held on 3 June 1948
- Resolution adopted by the United Nations Commission for India and Pakistan on 13 August 1948
- Resolution adopted by the United Nations Commission for India and Pakistan on 5 January 1949
- Proposal in respect of Jammu and Kashmir made by General A.G.L. McNaughton, President of the Security Council of the United Nations on 22 December 1949
- Resolution 80 (1950) adopted by the Security Council at its 470th Meeting held on 14 March 1950
- Resolution 91 (1951) adopted by the Security Council at its 539th Meeting held on 30 March 1951
- Resolution 96 (1951) adopted by the Security Council al its 566th Meeting held on 10 November 1951
- Resolution 98 (1952) adopted by the Security Council at its 611th Meeting held on 23 December 1952
- Resolution 122 (1957) adopted by the Security Council at its 765th Meeting held on 24 January 1957
- Draft Resolution presented by Australia, Cuba, U.K. and U.S.A. on 14 February 1957
- Resolution 123 (1957) adopted by the Security Council at its 774th Meeting held on 21 February 1957
- Draft Resolution presented by Australia, Columbia,Philippines on 16 November 1957
- Resolution 126 (1957) adopted by the Security Council at its 808th Meeting held on 2 December 1957
- Draft Resolution submitted by Ireland to the Security Council on June 22, 1962
- Statement of the President of the Security Council (French Representative) made on the 18 May 1964 at the 1117th Meeting of the Council (Document No. S/PV. 1117, dated the 18 May l964) summarizing the conclusion of the debate on Kashmir
- Resolution 209 (1965) adopted by the Security Council at its 1237th Meeting held on 4 September 1965
- Resolution 210 (1965) adopted by the Security Council at its 1238th Meeting held on 6 September 1965
- Resolution 211 (1965) adopted by the Security Council at its 1242nd Meeting held on 20 September 1965
- Resolution 214 (1965) adopted by the Security Council at its 1245th Meeting held on 27 September 1965
- Resolution 215 (1965) adopted by the Security Council at its1251st Meeting held on 5 November 1965
- Resolution 303 (1971) adopted by the Security Council at its1606th Meeting held on 6 December 1971
- Question considered by the Security Council at its 1606th, 1607th and 1608th Meetings held on 4,5 and 6 December 1971
- Resolution 307 (1971) adopted by the Security Council at its 1616th Meeting held on 21 December 1971
http://www.kashmiri-cc.ca/un/index.htm
- Pakistani infrastructure needs. Building Pakistan up as a bulwark against American enemies”
- About the inane discussion of taking out Pakistan’s Nuclear weapons.”
- Taking out Pakistani Nuclear weapons.”
- This was an angry reaction to Benazir Bhutto’s unpatriotic comments. According to tradition, we should not say bad things about a dead person. May God Bless her soul.”
- Every time something bad happens, anti-Pakistan elements come out of the woodwork. Here is a response to the talking heads.”
- Pakistan: The Democrats still don’t get it!”
- Discussion of taking out Pakistani nukes: The White House should immediately repudiate this aggression and arrest Anti-Americansim”
- Discussion of taking out Pakistani nukes: The White House should immediately repudiate this aggression and arrest Anti-Americanism”
- Wish List from Pakistan to Santa America”
Perpetual Mimetic warfare - The Worst Islamphobes
- Where are the Pakistani nukes?
- On Liaqat Ali Khan: Who killed him?
- On deconstructing the wrong paradigm. Why the US Think Tank industry is wrong!
- Rebutting Cohen. He is an Indian agent!
- Another prophecy of doom for Pakistan. Blah Blah Blah!
Pakistanis want to hear “Thank You” for the US
Pakistanis to USA: We want “Friends Not Masters”
America: Say Thank You”
Pakistan US Relations should be normal not transactional”
Response to Congressman Hoyer on Pakistan”
On inadequate US Aid to Pakistan” - ….Pakistanis are not stupid and have their nukes hidden”
- The Democrats don’t get it
- Where in the world is Osama Bin Laden
- The speech that Bilawal Bhutto should have given. The words that Zardari should have shouted. The thoughts that Fahim should have communicated
- The CIA Connection…….The Benzair Bhutto Assassination was pre planned, the Zia model with a twist. The continued CIA involvement in Pakistan. The Great Game continues. When the Elephants dance the grass gets stamped upon…Pakistanis suffer. The purpose of this assignation is to destabilize Pakistan and find a reason to secure the Nukes
- Criticism of Benazir Bhutto’s 5E Campaign program
- Criticism of Benazir Bhutto. Pre-Assassination
- Who killed Liaqat Ali Khan?
On deconstructing the wrong paradigm of the USA media
Rebutting Cohen
Pakistanis are immune to another prophecy of doom
Pakistanis want to hear “Thank You” from the ingrate Americans. Nothing is good enough!
Pakistanis to USA: We want “Friends Not Masters”
Say Thank You
Pakistan US Relations should be normal not transactional
Response to Congressman Hoyer on Pakistan”
On inadequate US Aid to Pakistan
Where is Osama Bin Laden
Where are the Pakistani nukes? - Where is Leadership of the PPP? Why is it behaving like Nero. Stop the arson and the carnage. Ask for a national Day of prayer and reconciliation
- ” Open Letter to Mr. 10% Asif Zardari. Show some leadership
- Open Letter to Mr. Bilawal Bhutto
- The CIA connection—Benazir Bhutto assassination was pre-planned, the Zia model with a twist
- Benzir Bhuttos revenge from the grave: Annointing a despised and corrupt politician Mr. 10% as her successor
- Open letter to Mr. Zardari
- The 4th Bhutto assassination is a message to the USA. Hands Off Pakistan
- Here we go again! Another Indian prophecy of doom. The first one was in 1947
We would like to refer our readers to the an article on “Toppling the US military” that is worth its weight in gold. Search for it on this site. See: “Kissinger threatened Zulifiqar Ali Bhutto”
Enter a long URL to make tiny:If you would like a RSS feed from my site. This is the RSS URL for your widget: http://www.rupeenews.com/feed Directory of Politics/law/government Blogs
Noticias de Rupia | Nouvelles de Roupie | Rupiennachrichten | новости рупии | 卢比新闻 | Roepienieuws | Rupi Nyheter | ルピーニュース | Notizie di Rupia | PAKISTAN LEDGER | پاکستاني کھاتا | Moin Ansari | معین آنصآرّی | DefensebriefsIntellibriefs Translate to: RSS feed: | RUPEE NEWS | November 30th, 2007 | Moin Ansari | معین آنصآرّی | اخبار روپیہ |
No comments:
Post a Comment